Of course! Why wouldn’t they give a no-name a star over Knies when he scored what was essentially an empty net goal over Knies only scoring two beauties to send the game to overtime. Pretty obvious you give the no-name a star instead!
d_pyro
Rule 1 of giving out stars. The winning team should have more players with a star than the losing team.
Soul_Traitor
Number 1, 2 and 3 should have been Woll.
CardiologistSlow1531
Should have been:
1-Woll;
2-Nylander;
3-Knies
WintersbaneGDX
I think this whole stars system needs to go. It’s overly subjective, meaningless, and doesn’t take into account so many intangibles. What if Morgan Rielly said something really inspiring before the third period that got everyone fired up? What about Gio sacrificing himself on that blocked shot? What about Johansen making 50 saves?
The whole thing is dumb.
iconodule1981
Johansson should be there; Tavares had a good game, to be sure, but Knies had the edge.
Barre was the recipient of Kucherov’s skill – not bad, but less deserving than Johansson in a loss.
heythisisnick
I’m okay with JT and Kucherov being 1sr/2nd, but if you’re giving the 3rd star to a Lightning player, how is it not Johansson? He still made 48 saves – probably one of his best NHL games. I thought he made some nice stops in tight.
thevoiceinsidemyhead
Just shows you how petty the lightning are top to bottom. I like it.
pojebana-malpa
Woll deserved 1st star
JimBeefLakeMonster
Home team chooses, it’s not really a real accolade so don’t take it too seriously
in-dog_we_trust
(I could only listen to the game on the radio)
JT had a really good game
Knies had, perhaps, his best game to date
The difference is JT is the captain and has 14 years experience. Knies (and Domi) helped bring the Leafs back to life.
Johansson played stellar hockey
Woll played a perfect 2/3 + of a game.
Johansson stopped some brilliant shots really kept Tampa in the game. 48 saves us usually enough for the W.
Woll saved the game. Basically had a shutout. Robbed a few Tampa players. The difference was 1 goal. If you say the 3 against Samsonov cancel out the 3 regulation goals. Johansson still made 48 saves but the winner has to go to the guy who got the W.
Based on this
1. Knies
2. Will
3. Johansson
But in no way should Tampa have 2 of 3.
AngryInched
Being on the ice when your team scores 3 goals and still ending up a -1. Fuck Kutcherov
BigPZ
No Woll or Knies?
LeafsFan26420
That’s fucked up
Shabloinks
That’s some Boulet shit.
throwaway___34
It’s meaningless. It’s like getting upset about the all star game.
Commander-Fox-Q-
Surprised it’s not knies, kucherov, johansson tbh just going off stats
SnazzyCazzy1
Im just laughing that Kuch is a -1 with 3 points 😂😂😂
formed2forge
Bahahah. What a joke!
formed2forge
I don’t hate Kutch being on there. He DID score the game-winning goal.
21 Comments
Tampa cope
Of course! Why wouldn’t they give a no-name a star over Knies when he scored what was essentially an empty net goal over Knies only scoring two beauties to send the game to overtime. Pretty obvious you give the no-name a star instead!
Rule 1 of giving out stars. The winning team should have more players with a star than the losing team.
Number 1, 2 and 3 should have been Woll.
Should have been:
1-Woll;
2-Nylander;
3-Knies
I think this whole stars system needs to go. It’s overly subjective, meaningless, and doesn’t take into account so many intangibles. What if Morgan Rielly said something really inspiring before the third period that got everyone fired up? What about Gio sacrificing himself on that blocked shot? What about Johansen making 50 saves?
The whole thing is dumb.
Johansson should be there; Tavares had a good game, to be sure, but Knies had the edge.
Barre was the recipient of Kucherov’s skill – not bad, but less deserving than Johansson in a loss.
I’m okay with JT and Kucherov being 1sr/2nd, but if you’re giving the 3rd star to a Lightning player, how is it not Johansson? He still made 48 saves – probably one of his best NHL games. I thought he made some nice stops in tight.
Just shows you how petty the lightning are top to bottom. I like it.
Woll deserved 1st star
Home team chooses, it’s not really a real accolade so don’t take it too seriously
(I could only listen to the game on the radio)
JT had a really good game
Knies had, perhaps, his best game to date
The difference is JT is the captain and has 14 years experience. Knies (and Domi) helped bring the Leafs back to life.
Johansson played stellar hockey
Woll played a perfect 2/3 + of a game.
Johansson stopped some brilliant shots really kept Tampa in the game. 48 saves us usually enough for the W.
Woll saved the game. Basically had a shutout. Robbed a few Tampa players. The difference was 1 goal. If you say the 3 against Samsonov cancel out the 3 regulation goals. Johansson still made 48 saves but the winner has to go to the guy who got the W.
Based on this
1. Knies
2. Will
3. Johansson
But in no way should Tampa have 2 of 3.
Being on the ice when your team scores 3 goals and still ending up a -1. Fuck Kutcherov
No Woll or Knies?
That’s fucked up
That’s some Boulet shit.
It’s meaningless. It’s like getting upset about the all star game.
Surprised it’s not knies, kucherov, johansson tbh just going off stats
Im just laughing that Kuch is a -1 with 3 points 😂😂😂
Bahahah. What a joke!
I don’t hate Kutch being on there. He DID score the game-winning goal.