@Canucks de Vancouver

Destinations commerciales de Conor Garland : quatre propositions que les Canucks devraient considérer


Destinations commerciales de Conor Garland : quatre propositions que les Canucks devraient considérer


arsenality

11 Comments

  1. arsenality

    I like the three way trade for our team, but I wonder if it makes sense for Washington and Montreal.

  2. dudesszz

    What a unrealistic and garbage article. Garland has negative value. There is no sweepstakes as it’s put in the article. If any of those trades were available the Canucks would of have made the trade call so fast and started laughing about the heist they just made.

    Honestly it reads like an out of touch homer writing drunken drivel on a message board or something.

    Why would Sportsnet editors allow it to be posted?

  3. mediumyeet

    Caps MTL trade seems unrealistic.

    Preds trade I think we would have to add or retain. I’d like Fabbro though he is steady.

    WPG trade is intriguing for sure. Even if it was just for Appleton I’d be okay with that.

    CBJ I’m not sure we are all that interested in Peeke. He’s got the same term left and is borderline replacement level. He could be solid but could also just be dead cap.

  4. MostStrong

    Sportsnet has reduced itself to mock trades?

  5. vancouver000

    Garland for Bedard. Book it.

  6. 21marvel1

    I’d take the Chisholm + Appleton for Garland with the Jets and the Fabbro for Garland with the Preds, but not the other two

  7. The Winnipeg and the Columbus ones are probably the likeliest scenarios.

    Can’t see that VCR – MON – WAH trade happening. And Fabbro is more necessary now too. He’s also a pending RFA and we don’t know the value of his contract yet and we have two big contracts in Petey and Hronek that need to be signed. Plus OEL’s buyout cap hit will jump as well.

    E: Fabbro is more necessary for NSH

  8. NerdPunch

    At the end of the day… I would rather see Van attach a 2nd (or slightly more but not a 1st) to Garland versus trading him with salary retention or taking on a worse contract.

    That $5M over 3 seasons has tangible value.. retaining/taking on onerous contracts would be an L.

  9. thelifeisthedream

    Nobody wants Garlander unless we pay them to take him. If he wants out he needs to buck up like Horvat did to get himself traded

  10. ebb_omega

    Man, the Basant Motors curse really is a thing isn’t it?

    Garland – aiming to be traded
    Podz – hard hit, in concussion protocol

    We need to form a protective circle around Dakota Joshua.

  11. Vanrainy1

    More pedantic speculation, this is getting as bad as the JT speculation at last year’s deadline..

Write A Comment

Pin