@Canucks de Vancouver

Cette interview de Bieksa était HILARANTE (et traumatisante pour les fans des Canucks)



Cette entrevue hilarante lors du classique NHL Heritage entre les Flames de Calgary et les Oilers d’Edmonton rappelle des souvenirs terribles et comiques aux fans des Canucks de Vancouver alors que Kevin Bieksa et Chris Tanev discutent du bon vieux temps. Cela fait référence à la chute éventuelle de l’équipe des Canucks et à l’échange de Roberto Luongo en raison de la décision de John Tortorella lors de la Heritage Classic 2014. #HeritageClassicInterview #CanucksMemories #LuongoTrade #NHLComedy #vancouvercanucks Assurez-vous de vous abonner et d’activer les notifications pour le dernier contenu ! Clause de non-responsabilité relative aux droits d’auteur En vertu de l’article 107 de la loi sur le droit d’auteur de 1976, une « utilisation équitable » est autorisée à des fins telles que la critique, les commentaires, les reportages d’actualité, l’enseignement, l’érudition et la recherche. L’utilisation équitable est une utilisation autorisée par la loi sur le droit d’auteur qui pourrait autrement constituer une violation. L’utilisation à but non lucratif, éducative ou personnelle fait pencher la balance en faveur d’une utilisation équitable. Aucune violation du droit d’auteur n’est prévue. TOUS LES DROITS APPARTIENNENT À LEURS PROPRIÉTAIRES RESPECTIFS

19 Comments

  1. Bieksa is the best commentator on the planet. He's one of the few guys left who isn't dull, boring and corporate. I'm shocked he hasn't been "let go quietly" by Rogers. They like their Tomlinsons not Bieksas.

  2. Bieksa is the only reason I watch the talkies after the game …

  3. The early 2010s was such a dominant time for the canucks with coming nearly 1 win short from winning a cup for the first time and obviously the back to back presidents trophies in both 2011 and 2012. Ever since the mid 2010s the Canucks have been inconsistent and mediocre at best. I personally thought it was kind of unfair they fired tortorella after just 1 season and would've preferred it if they maybe did it during the 2014-2015 season or after the 2014-2015 season ended if they really had to do it. Letting a guy go after 2 seasons is fine if the right reasons are there but after just 1 season seems just dirty. It should be 2 seasons or more for letting guys go if things don't pan out 1 season seems unfair. Their lackluster 2013-2014 season wasn't torts' fault at all (except for obviously the herritage classic not starting luongo leading to luongo getting traded at the deadline rather than simply wait until the off season like they did with kesler) I'm no canucks fan by any means but I sure did have a lot of respect for them especially in the early 2010s when they were the face of the western conference.

  4. Couldn’t agree more!
    Bieksa is the future of hockey broadcasters.
    He brings a much needed element to the profession.

  5. Should've asked Tanev ( Gramps) about 19 and Sam bennit, Johnny hockey's haisty departure from Cal – Gary ? We all have a sense of humor, no? The Canadian team's under Betmans' ridiculousness all get participant medals . Sad I know. Bieksa he's always been a funny guy. Maybe the digital boards, maybe next interview tackle that?

  6. As an Oiler fan that hated Bieksa as a player, I absolutely love him in the desk. He's such a great communicator with his humor and league inside knowledge. Chirps are great and his style is always classy.

  7. You did not even mention the the winner of that 2014 heritage classic Van vs OTT .
    Add correct context to the story smh
    Let me remind you
    Go Sens Go !!!

  8. They should have kept the 2011 team together and have kept trying to win the cup like Tampa did. Tampa lost and lost until they won a few cups. Canucks dismantled to quickly in retrospect

  9. ye gods…can someone ask Tanny to put his teeth in when doing interviews…that just gives me the heebie-jeebies.

Write A Comment

Pin