Would be scary letting a guy like Kent go at this point because we have no idea what he is yet. Could be a 60 point 2nd line guy or a 90 point 1st liner for the next 12 years.
EverlastingEvening
This doesn’t really make sense for us unless our FO is really desperate to win now.
Or we wait to see if he hits free agency and keep Kent
ddottay
No
cusidhe_
Quote from the article:
> Lindholm is a pending UFA and any extension would likely be eight years and take him into his later 30s. Not exactly a great idea for a team that’s closer to rebuilding than contending.
So why does this make sense for CBJ then? lmfao. They’re not getting KJ, nice try.
AlanLGuy
Lmao, what an awful trade proposal, less than 1 year of a pending UFA for an up and coming potential start player? I love the “Jackets are thing at center” that keeps getting thrown around despite drafting Fantilli, and Boone playing well at that position for going on 3 years now. They also compare Roslovic to Lindholm, who has played what, maybe half his games for CBJ at wing instead of center?
Johnson for Lindholm makes sense if they toss in this years first round pick, but I think that’s a little more than they want to pay
tina_specials
Calgary is obsessed with trading their players to us for our prospects and draft picks lately
Big_Bluebird8040
i would in a heartbeat. please tell me why we shouldn’t be competing next year or the year after?
ueindowndkdk
Would they take a Bemstrom and Boqvist for him? We’ll even throw in a bag of pucks.
Dense-Plenty5420
Possibly the worst “trade proposal” I’ve seen. These folks must be drinking too much purple stuff thinking anyone would think this is a decent offer.
Archangel612
How’re we always linked to teams with trades that are just bafflingly weighted towards the other team? It’s insulting tbh
DoubleDumpsterFire
Jarmo isn’t that dumb.
Steamu90
It makes sense if and only if Lindolm is extended to 6-7 years and with good term. Even then it is a tough one
GarretBarrett
lol add a couple firsts and then I’ll listen. Short of that, absolutely no fucking way
16 Comments
Dumb.
Would be scary letting a guy like Kent go at this point because we have no idea what he is yet. Could be a 60 point 2nd line guy or a 90 point 1st liner for the next 12 years.
This doesn’t really make sense for us unless our FO is really desperate to win now.
[counter offer](https://youtu.be/0cgbZqR2AGI?feature=shared)
Or we wait to see if he hits free agency and keep Kent
No
Quote from the article:
> Lindholm is a pending UFA and any extension would likely be eight years and take him into his later 30s. Not exactly a great idea for a team that’s closer to rebuilding than contending.
So why does this make sense for CBJ then? lmfao. They’re not getting KJ, nice try.
Lmao, what an awful trade proposal, less than 1 year of a pending UFA for an up and coming potential start player? I love the “Jackets are thing at center” that keeps getting thrown around despite drafting Fantilli, and Boone playing well at that position for going on 3 years now. They also compare Roslovic to Lindholm, who has played what, maybe half his games for CBJ at wing instead of center?
Johnson for Lindholm makes sense if they toss in this years first round pick, but I think that’s a little more than they want to pay
Calgary is obsessed with trading their players to us for our prospects and draft picks lately
i would in a heartbeat. please tell me why we shouldn’t be competing next year or the year after?
Would they take a Bemstrom and Boqvist for him? We’ll even throw in a bag of pucks.
Possibly the worst “trade proposal” I’ve seen. These folks must be drinking too much purple stuff thinking anyone would think this is a decent offer.
How’re we always linked to teams with trades that are just bafflingly weighted towards the other team? It’s insulting tbh
Jarmo isn’t that dumb.
It makes sense if and only if Lindolm is extended to 6-7 years and with good term. Even then it is a tough one
lol add a couple firsts and then I’ll listen. Short of that, absolutely no fucking way