Fanatics brand Mitchell & Ness is not good quality. It’s sad because old M&N jerseys were probably the best replicas ever made.
TechEducator25
It breaks my heart at how shitty these jerseys are.
First off, the color is completely wrong, second the material isn’t close to what the jerseys actually were, third they’re $200.
They’re a rip off and they’re trash.
Do better, sharks!
HockeyHawkins
Omg I love the idea of these 🙁
It’s sad they’re so bad quality, and the price? Geez people!
sharkterritory
Great idea. Horrible execution.
FormulaT1
It’s disappointing how bad these are (the thin material, the « patches », the way-too-thick black band at the top of the back, among other things). A cash grab if ever there was one. I feel like these would be nicer if the Sharks had them produced in-house as opposed to just putting out the Fanatics « Mitchell & Ness » line that they were likely forced to put out with the rest of the league
5 Comments
Fanatics brand Mitchell & Ness is not good quality. It’s sad because old M&N jerseys were probably the best replicas ever made.
It breaks my heart at how shitty these jerseys are.
First off, the color is completely wrong, second the material isn’t close to what the jerseys actually were, third they’re $200.
They’re a rip off and they’re trash.
Do better, sharks!
Omg I love the idea of these 🙁
It’s sad they’re so bad quality, and the price? Geez people!
Great idea. Horrible execution.
It’s disappointing how bad these are (the thin material, the « patches », the way-too-thick black band at the top of the back, among other things). A cash grab if ever there was one. I feel like these would be nicer if the Sharks had them produced in-house as opposed to just putting out the Fanatics « Mitchell & Ness » line that they were likely forced to put out with the rest of the league