@Canucks de Vancouver

Les Canucks SIGNENT Daniel SPRONG !!! #Canucks



Comment Rutherford & Allvin ont-ils réussi à recruter Daniel Sprong ? Parlons de cette solide signature des Canucks. Mes diffusions en direct et mes vidéos sont conçues pour vous, les fans des Canucks. Apportez vos questions et commentaires sur les Canucks afin que nous puissions discuter. Pour me suivre sur : X (Twitter) https://twitter.com/KempnerCanucks Facebook : Rechercher Kempner Canucks YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@kempnercanucks/videos Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/kempnercanucks Merci d’avoir regardé Kempner Canucks ! Si vous voulez du contenu passionné, réaliste et honnête sur les Canucks, appuyez sur le bouton J’aime et m’abonner. Merci pour votre soutien. Devenez membre de RevTrev pour avoir accès aux avantages : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXAT6T7qTyy7I1gRRTuHwWQ/join Je recommande vivement StreamYard. Cela amène mon contenu sportif à un autre niveau ! Vous voulez créer des diffusions en direct comme celle-ci ? Je recommande vivement StreamYard. Il élève mon contenu sportif à un autre niveau ! Vous souhaitez créer des flux en direct comme celui-ci ? Je recommande vivement StreamYard : https://streamyard.com/pal/d/6623582615240704

40 Comments

  1. Canucks only have 3 top 6 players

    DeBrusk is middle six.

    As are Garland / Hoaglander are but better suited for bottom 6.

    2 top 4 D

    Soucy and Myers would barely crack a contending team’s top 6 D.

    But yes… great signing another bottom 6 player

    👏👏👏

    Pathetic

  2. He’s 27 and scored 20 goals once. That doesn’t make him a 20 goal scorer. There is a reason he was still available for nothing. He’s a decent hand but no point staining your T shirt over this guy. He’s a decent bottom 6 addition if he plays with EP then something bad has happened.

  3. Diguisseppe had 10pts in 51 gms. Sprong 42pts on one of the worst teams in the league.

    Not, apparently, a good defensive player. Defense can be coached, scoring is something you have or don't.

  4. has canucks signed a diamond in the rough? he had 20 goals a year not a game. fruedian slip.
    can they found another diamond on defense?

  5. I find it funny, how Canucks need to find a winger for Petey or need to find a top 6 scoring winger or wingers. Canucks had the perfect guy in Kuzmenko. Petey got over 100 points with him and Kuz got like 70+ points and almost 40 goals. But let's get rid of this guy, so now Canucks have to find a replacement? Makes a lot of sense to me. Yes, I know Tocchet didn't like him but look what happened to Petey and look at all the trouble trying to find a replacement. And no one knows how good or bad these new players are going to be.

  6. Ever since the season ended and the off season started I was advocating for the Canucks to get Sprong, I didn't understand why no team has signed him so I was hoping the Canucks would be the team to sign him. So I can't believe we got him now! And for that price too! Talk about a no risk deal.

  7. He's playing for next year this could workout real well….better than Joshua's old deal

  8. Dude I told you like 3 weeks ago that they should sign this guy and you basically said I was out to lunch on this one. During the live stream even.

  9. Just watched his highlights. One thing i noticed is he can score in variety of ways from different areas. Very deceptive and definitely talented. But is he a Tochett guy?

  10. To bad the Cup winning OEL's cap hit will be almost 5 million in year 3,4 of buyout.

  11. Nice bit Trev! Sorry ive missed your live bits man . Keep up the good work. Dude!! As for number Bring back Sandlak' s #25

  12. The boys are looking good for next year! Im really looking forward to seeing what sprong can do on the canucks roster.

  13. i honestly think Debrusk, Boeser and our Mighty Miller can potentially be a sleeper top NHL line. This guy will be a million dollar Kuzmenko, perfect linemate for Petey till Leks is ready.

  14. Can’t use #17 that’s Hronek.. SHOULDN’T use #88 it’s been nothing but bad luck with Canucks in the past.. I’m voting for #91!

Write A Comment

Pin