@Flyers de Philadelphie

Pourquoi le numéro 27 de Reggie Leach n’est-il pas retiré ?


Son record avec les Flyers, 61 buts en une seule saison, tient toujours 50 ans plus tard.

Ses 19 buts en séries éliminatoires constituent un record de la ligue qui tient toujours 50 ans plus tard.

Aucun autre Flyer n’a jamais marqué 5 buts en un seul match.

Il a remporté le Conn Smythe lors d’une année perdante.

Il a gagné une coupe.

Il a joué un rôle important dans la séquence de 35 victoires consécutives, un record à l’échelle de la ligue qui tient toujours.

Ses points de carrière s’élèvent à 666 (le nombre de la bête), ce qui est plutôt cool.

Ici au Canada, quand les gens disent "les brutes de la rue Broad" les gens disent "Clarke Barber Leach" avant de mentionner MacLeish, Shultz ou même d’autres gars avec des numéros à la retraite comme Parent ou Ashbee (sans leur manquer de respect).

Quel est le problème ?


scratchydaitchy

9 Comments

  1. StubbornLeech07

    Because he’s not in the Hockey Hall of Fame which seem to be a prerequisite for the Flyers to retire a number. Ashbee being the one exception to that prerequisite.

  2. HatontheBed31

    There was always a thing with the Flyers that only Hockey Hall of Famers got their number retired (Ashbee being a special case). It even applied to Mark Howe.

  3. dishwasher_mayhem

    Was Reggie Leach more important to the team and history than Ron Hextall? He’s the Flyers all-time winningest goalie. He scored the first goal by a goalie in both regular season and playoffs. He won the Conn Smyth losing to the Oilers in the finals and the Vezina for the season.

    I love both of these men but I think there becomes a real issue retiring the number for one but not the other.

  4. AC_Lerock

    Mark Messier wore #11 for the Rangers after Hadfield. They retired 11 and had ceremonies separately for both players. Not sure why the Flyers couldn’t do this for Leach and Hextall in one ceremony. IMO, that would actually be pretty cool. Both players’ records will be in Flyers’ history books forever probably, so outside of the HHoF requirement, they are historically great and memorable Flyers first and foremost. They should retire #27.

  5. NowFook

    Hes a legend in the club which is why hes in Flyers Hall of Fame but as a player he only had one elite season so simply isnt good enough

    In his entire career he only had 2 point per game seasons and hit 80 points once …

    Its still not out of the question that it could happen since hes a legend for the Flyers, but it hasnt happened because he simply wasnt good enough as purely a player.

    Everybody else who has number retired are Hockey Hall of Famers (and Ashbee) which hes not even close to good enough for

  6. Perryplat199

    *35 game unbeaten streak.

    A decent amount of those games ended in ties.

    I personally like Leach as *the* 27 for the flyers but he just didn’t quite get there.

  7. realdeal411

    TBH I think retired numbers should be left for the top of the top. I’m fine with the current group of retirees

  8. He’s not in the Hockey Hall.of Fame. That’s (very rightfully) how the Flyers do it.

    If you want a franchise vibes honor, that’s what the Flyers Hall of Fame is for.

Write A Comment

Pin