@Bruins de Boston

Cam Neely s’exprime sur l’impasse contractuelle de Jeremy Swayman avec les Bruins



Le président des Bruins, Cam Neely, a exprimé sa frustration quant au fait que Jeremy Swayman n’ait pas encore signé, ajoutant que le gardien de but a « 64 millions de raisons » de jouer au hockey en ce moment.

12 Comments

  1. You guys should be fired if you don’t sign your goal Tender you guys are all liars you mean you lied to the fans

  2. Wow 64 million for a guy that platooned for the past 3 seasons. It’s time to turn the page. If Swayman thinks he’s anywhere near that contract he better be like Tim Thomas and Grant Fuhr rolled into one.

  3. Why in the heck did they trade Ullmark before signing Sway? Are these guys stupid they deserve this cluster F&*( they got themselves into.

  4. Gonna take management's side on this one. Jeremy is a great goalie, but another few years of continuing to prove that should be in order. How about a shorter, like 2 year contract first?

  5. You lying into fans and fence go to your games if it’s not for the fan, you guys will not be where you are so I’ll make that happen and give him the money. I think that’s a little ball of 64 he wants nine 9 million give it to himif you give your defenseman 9.5 you can’t cut the goalie 9.5 or 9 million somethings wrong with you guys.

  6. Yeah, we won't negotiate with our star goalie. We pushed him into arbitration one year, and then the next we spent away, leaving only a set amount for your deal, so I guess there's no negotiation. Now we're trying to turn the fanbase against you because you don't want to be paid 20 – 25 % less than your value. Don and Cam are fu!@ing a$$holes. They're the ones responsible. He's the only mid-20s top 5 goalie in the league(Demko, maybe, but he's injured a lot), and he wants to be paid like the rare player he is. This deal only takes him to 33 or 34. He's in his prime the whole deal. Sweeney could've had him signed for 6mill, and he said no like the genius he is.

Write A Comment

Pin