Philipp Kurashev a marqué un but controversé en prolongation pour porter les Blackhawks de Chicago à une victoire de 3-2 contre les Canadiens de Montréal.
@Blackhawks de Chicago
Philipp Kurashev a marqué un but controversé en prolongation pour porter les Blackhawks de Chicago à une victoire de 3-2 contre les Canadiens de Montréal.
34 Comments
Clearly offside. Bad call.
We, the fans, have gone through a rough period over the last 2 years. We don't need referee's making it worse!
what the damn hell
Situation room may have been hot boxed
John 3:16
For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son that whosoever believeth in Him shall not perish but have everlasting life.
looked to me like his skates were over before he touched the puck. Regardless, I don't know why they don't go back to the old rule. It was more black and white.
theres a dang-it for mr. stove dangle.
Романов затащил в овертайм. Но эти бездари, господи слов нет. Таким же лузерам залетели
Total bullshit goal in overtime. Funny how every time a call could possibly go either way, the TORONTO review center rules against the Canadians. Possibly Torontonians still haven't swallowed last season's playoffs defeat at the hands of the Habs?
So offside. Feel sorry for ref.When is Toronto going to stop making calls at hockey central.
2:53 Are they still not calling interference?
If it was Gallagher he be call 10 min extreme offside and a game misconduct for killed the goalie and 3 years of jail
They should make the instigator penalty 5min I'm tired of bums attacking someone every time theres a clean hit
If its dirty i understand.. But if you wanna respond to a clean hard hit.. then wait your turn and hit the guy back
Гол?!?!
According to rule 83 and 63.6 the OT goal is a good goal.
Who's working the head office? Terrible call.
Why put a spoiler in the description?
Would be a good goal if it wasn't offside .
BTW , I am a Hawks fan since 1959
Not sure what replays they were looking at, but the net was clearly off before the puck was in. Plus what about goalie interference? The Hawks player made no effort to avoid the goalie. The offside is close but he had control of the puck. What a joke.
Habs fans are the biggest babies ever lol
I cant seem to put my finger on why the hell haven't they fired the damn couch on Montreal well dang I seen Vegas lose 4 games in a row and they fire him lol NHL refs need there eyes checked
A thread chock full of Habs fans whining. They is why people hate Habs fans…lol.
As a Leaf’s fan and neutral. That was not a goal!
Why do they feel the need to rig these games? Can it stop being about the money for once.
I had to examine both replays and both calls are correct
We need price back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
im confused wasnt that offside !
If the poc is in the blue line I guess it s good,it s like to have a skate on the blue line,but not from the slow motion sequence;when he entered the zone:when he was the 2 skates inside the zone the stick and the poc of course were outside the zone.
A goaler standing up is always supposed to have the pallet on the ice and straight.If I were goaler I would buy the best sticks from my selection.
Instead of running to the guy and hit the net I would jump or turn on a side before.
I ll buy a inovative new goaler inovation to play outside fo next winter.
They shall make something moving you know:to change open spots.
Well Canadiens got their draw point and if Chicago go to playoffs that s good.
But the reff s job,I can t tell,if he and the NHL continue like this.
Thank you Hawks for taking out the trash.
with out a superstar goalie this team is in the bottom 🤣🤣
mtl might make playoff in 2040
Wow romanov quelle but
Go hawks